Detection of C. difficile common antigen: comparison of methods

Submitted: 13 February 2014
Accepted: 13 February 2014
Published: 30 September 2011
Abstract Views: 1467
PDF: 1232
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

In order to identify and define a diagnostic algorithm for the diagnosis of C. difficile infection, a comparative study was carried out at the Microbiology Laboratory of “Maggiore della Carità” Hospital in Novara.We compared the system currently in use in the laboratory “TECHLAB C.difficile Quik Chek Complete (Inverness Medical, USA)”, an immunoenzymatic assay for the simultaneous detection of C. difficile common antigen (GDH) and Toxins A&B, with the new ImmunoCard Clostridium difficile GDH (Meridian Bioscience, USA), which identifies the C. difficile Common Antigen GDH. The results proved identical between the two assays: of 100 samples, 82 resulted negative with both tests, 18 were GDH positive with both tests. Out of the 18 GDH positives, 9 resulted positive for the Toxins portion of the TechLab test.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Brunelli, M. G., Tamburelli, S., Molinari, G. L., & Andreoni, S. (2011). Detection of C. difficile common antigen: comparison of methods. Microbiologia Medica, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/mm.2011.2356