https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2012.824
0
0
0
0
Smart Citations
0
0
0
0
Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

Religious slaughter and animal welfare: data from an online consultation

Authors

C. Baldinelli
chiarabaldinelli85@gmail.com
Master Sanità pubblica veterinaria e igiene degli alimenti, Università degli Studi di Perugia, via San Costanzo, 4 – 06126 Perugia, Italy.
P. Sechi
Master Sanità pubblica veterinaria e igiene degli alimenti, Università degli Studi di Perugia, via San Costanzo, 4 – 06126 Perugia, Italy.
V. Cambiotti
Master Sanità pubblica veterinaria e igiene degli alimenti, Università degli Studi di Perugia, via San Costanzo, 4 – 06126 Perugia, Italy.
S. Parmegiani
Master Sanità pubblica veterinaria e igiene degli alimenti, Università degli Studi di Perugia, via San Costanzo, 4 – 06126 Perugia, Italy.
B.T. Cenci Goga
Master Sanità pubblica veterinaria e igiene degli alimenti, Università degli Studi di Perugia, via San Costanzo, 4 – 06126 Perugia, Italy.
Two are the main results of the online survey, which was conducted with the purpose to examine the purchase behavior of a group of consumers and their views on animal welfare and religious slaughter. First result is the respondents’ great interest about the question on animal welfare, which is in accordance with the growing interest of European citizens about this issue. Second is the demand for a more transparent labeling of animal products, which would be also concerning animal welfare and slaughter method used. These results are in conflict with marketing analysis, which find that consumers want to receive only positive information. Paradoxically, the more information is transmitted to reassure consumers the higher risk to alarm them.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
    No metrics available.
see details

Downloads

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

How to Cite

1.
Baldinelli C, Sechi P, Cambiotti V, Parmegiani S, Cenci Goga B. Religious slaughter and animal welfare: data from an online consultation. Ital J Food Safety [Internet]. 2012 Oct. 31 [cited 2025 Mar. 11];1(5):27-32. Available from: https://www.pagepressjournals.org/ijfs/article/view/ijfs.2012.5.27

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.