COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES

Submitted: 13 February 2013
Accepted: 13 February 2013
Published: 13 December 2009
Abstract Views: 1075
PDF: 4292
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the conventional methods for detection of Listeria monocytogenes in food using media Oxford and ALOA (Agar Listeria acc. to Ottaviani & Agosti) in according to the ISO 11290-1 to a new chromogenic medium “CHROMagar Listeria” standardized in 2005 AFNOR ( CHR – 21/1-12/01). A total of 40 pre-packed ready-to-eat food samples were examined. Using two methods six samples were found positive for Listeria monocytogenes but the medium “CHROMagar Listeria” was more selective in comparison with the others. In conclusion this study has demonstrated that isolation medium able to target specifically the detection of L. monocytogenes such as “CHROMagar Listeria” is highly recommendable because of that detection time is significantly reduced and the analysis cost is less expensive.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

1.
Novello L, Di Pinto A, Bonerba E, Montemurro F, Tantillo G. COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES. Ital J Food Safety [Internet]. 2009 Dec. 13 [cited 2024 Oct. 5];1(6):23-6. Available from: https://www.pagepressjournals.org/ijfs/article/view/ijfs.2009.6.23