Image guided robotic surgery: Current evidence for effectiveness in urology


Submitted: January 23, 2015
Accepted: January 23, 2015
Published: December 30, 2014
Abstract Views: 1658
PDF: 1024
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Anum Pervez MRC Centre for Transplantation, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, King’s Health Partners, King’s College London and Department of Urology, Guy’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  • Kamran Ahmed MRC Centre for Transplantation, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, King’s Health Partners, King’s College London and Department of Urology, Guy’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  • Stephen Thompson MRC Centre for Transplantation, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, King’s Health Partners, King’s College London and Department of Urology, Guy’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  • Oussama Elhage MRC Centre for Transplantation, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, King’s Health Partners, King’s College London and Department of Urology, Guy’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  • M. Shamim Khan MRC Centre for Transplantation, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, King’s Health Partners, King’s College London and Department of Urology, Guy’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  • Prokar Dasgupta MRC Centre for Transplantation, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, King’s Health Partners, King’s College London and Department of Urology, Guy’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Objectives: Discussion of the evolution of image guided surgery (IGS) and its fundamental components and current evidence for effectiveness of IGS in clinical urology. Methods: Literature search for image-guided robotic urology. Results: Current literature in image-guided robotic urology with its use in robot assisted radical prostatectomy and robot assisted partial nephrectomy are shown. Conclusions: Image guided surgery can be a useful aid to improve visualisation of anatomy and subsurface structures during minimally invasive surgery. Soft-tissue deformation makes it difficult to implement IGS in urology but current studies have shown an attempt to address this issue. The feasibility of IGS requires randomised control trials assessing in particular its accuracy and affect on clinical outcome.

Pervez, A., Ahmed, K., Thompson, S., Elhage, O., Khan, M. S., & Dasgupta, P. (2014). Image guided robotic surgery: Current evidence for effectiveness in urology. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 86(4), 245–248. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2014.4.245

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations