Factors affecting surgical margin positivity in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy
Submitted: November 7, 2016
Accepted: January 11, 2017
Published: March 31, 2017
Accepted: January 11, 2017
Abstract Views: 1613
PDF: 896
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Similar Articles
- Rashad Sholan, Radical prostatectomy outcomes of prostate cancer cases: Insights from a leading surgeon's experience in Azerbaijan , Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia: Vol. 96 No. 4 (2024)
- Ozgur Haki Yuksel, Ahmet Urkmez, Ayhan Verit, Can perineural invasion detected in prostate needle biopsy specimens predict surgical margin positivity in D’Amico low risk patients? , Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia: Vol. 88 No. 2 (2016)
- Osman Koca, Sıtkı Ün, Hakan Türk, Ferruh Zorlu, The factors predicting biochemical recurrence in patients with radical prostatectomy , Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia: Vol. 87 No. 4 (2015)
- Volkan Tugcu, Abdulmuttalip Simsek, Ismail Evren, Kamil Gokhan Seker, Ramazan Kocakaya, Bugra Dogukan Torer, Arda Atar, Ali Ihsan Tasci, Single plus one port robotic radical prostatectomy (SPORP); Initial experience , Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia: Vol. 89 No. 3 (2017)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.