Cover Image

Evaluation of laparoscopic vs robotic partial nephrectomy using the margin, ischemia and complications score system: a retrospective single center analysis

Stefano Ricciardulli, Qiang Ding, Xu Zhang, Hongzhao Li, Yuzhe Tang, Guoqiang Yang, Xiyou Wang, Xin Ma, Alberto Breda, Antonio Celia
  • Stefano Ricciardulli
    Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, Bassano Del Grappa, Italy | stefano.ricciardulli@gmail.com
  • Qiang Ding
    Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Xu Zhang
    Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Hongzhao Li
    Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Yuzhe Tang
    Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Guoqiang Yang
    Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Xiyou Wang
    Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Xin Ma
    Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Alberto Breda
    Department of Urology, Foundacio Puigvert Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain
  • Antonio Celia
    Department of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, Bassano Del Grappa, Italy

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate differences between Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy (LPN) and Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) using the Margin, Ischemia and Complications (MIC) score system and to evaluate factors related with MIC success. Materials and Methods: Single centre retrospective study on 258 LPN and 58 RAPN performed between January 2012 and January 2014. Success was defined when surgical margins was negative, Warm Ischemia Time (WIT) was ≤ 20 minutes and no major complications occurred. Mann-Whitney-U and Pearson χ2 correlation were used to compare LPN and RAPN. A matched pair comparison was also performed. Spearman correlation (Rho) was used to evaluate the relationship between clinical, intra and post-operative and pathological patients characteristics with MIC score. A binary regression analysis was also performed to evaluate independent factors associated with MIC success. Results: The MIC rate in LPN and RAPN was 55% and 65.5% respectively. No differences in clinical, intra and post-operative outcomes between groups were found. Clinical tumor size (p-value: < 0.001; OR: 0.829; 95% CI: 0.697-0.987), PADUA score (p-value: < 0.001; OR: 0.843; 95% CI: 0.740-0.960), PADUA risk groups (intermediate; p-value: < 0.001; OR: 0.416; 95% CI: 0.238- 0.792; high: p-value: < 0.001; OR: 0.356; 95% CI: 0.199- 0.636), WIT (p-value: < 0.001; OR: 0.598; 95% CI: 0.530- 0.675) were independently associated with MIC. eGFR (< 60 vs ≥ 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2: p-value: < 0.001; OR: 3.356; 95% CI: 1.701-6.621) and Fuhrman nuclear grade (p-value: 0.014; OR: 1.798; 95% CI:1.129-2.865) were also independently associated with MIC. Conclusions: MIC score system is a simple and useful tool to report and to compare different surgical approach.

Keywords

Complications; Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy; Positive margins; Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy; Warm ischemia time

Full Text:

PDF
Submitted: 2015-04-01 11:45:18
Published: 2015-03-31 00:00:00
Search for citations in Google Scholar
Related articles: Google Scholar
Abstract views:
12215

Views:
PDF
850

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


Copyright (c) 2015 Stefano Ricciardulli, Qiang Ding, Xu Zhang, Hongzhao Li, Yuzhe Tang, Guoqiang Yang, Xiyou Wang, Xin Ma, Alberto Breda, Antonio Celia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
 
© PAGEPress 2008-2017     -     PAGEPress is a registered trademark property of PAGEPress srl, Italy.     -     VAT: IT02125780185